This whole Core v Knots thing keeps getting weirder. Now, the core devs (which I have always respected for their commitment and work on Bitcoin) are all posting the same thing in unison, echoing a unified narrative, and sharing an article that focuses on ad hominem attacks on the person who has provided an alternative.
It reminds me of all the legacy media outlets, celebrities and influencers during COVID. It feels like there’s a puppet master somewhere behind the curtain.
Fake “leaks” and outright lies just scream organized psyop to me. No serious argument against the alternative.
I started reading the v30 PR the other day but haven’t had the chance to finish it. Does anyone have any other good resources that describe the differences and/or nuances of the situation? Maybe I just have to print out the git diff lol. The fact that the argument feels purposely confusing and urgent is also alarming to me.
Lastly, if Luke is a bad actor, what are his incentives? How is he somehow orchestrating a psyop all on his own?
So many questions that seem to grow faster than answers. I appreciate any intelligent discourse.
资料修改成功