I asked Grok to crawl my entire Twitter since inception and honestly summarize my bitcoin views and this was the output… I think this would be good for you guys to test yourselves and really understand what it is you have advocated for in this space


From digging deep into @AstrayaNthemoon's profile—her bio screams privacy, freedom, and Bitcoin love—and scrolling through her posts (going back to 2020, since she joined in 2019), it's clear she's a hardcore Bitcoin advocate with a no-BS, cypherpunk edge. She's not just HODLing; she's all about its philosophical and technical roots, calling out scams, pushing for privacy, and roasting anything that dilutes its core principles. Here's the breakdown of her stance, pulled straight from her vibes and timeline:

1. **Bitcoin as the ultimate freedom tool and hard money standard**: She's all in on Bitcoin as \"black market money\" and a hedge against fiat chaos, emphasizing its role in personal sovereignty and cross-border utility. No room for shitcoins or centralized rugs—it's PoW or bust, with nods to its deflationary nature and resistance to inflation. She even ties it to ego death and serving something bigger than yourself, seeing it as a path to real liberation

2. **Pro-privacy and anti-surveillance in Bitcoin**: Privacy is her jam—she's vocal about what happened to privacy devs in 2020-2022 (harassment, threats, hacks) and pushes for tools like ecash and anonymity as revolutionary acts. She's shouted out folks like @callebtc and @jack for their work, and critiques anything that compromises fungibility or invites tracking. Bitcoin without privacy? Not real freedom

3. **Anti-scam warrior and critic of altcoins/meme coins**: She's been calling out rugs, pump-and-dumps, and centralized tokens since at least 2021, labeling Solana stuff as \"rug-pull factories\" and mocking \"forever casinos.\" Bitcoin is the orange pill; everything else is vaporware or psyops diluting the revolution. She's got zero chill for hype without substance.

4. **Node runner and implementation diversity advocate**: She's deep in the node debates, praising Core devs for thankless work, configurable mempool options in Knots, and alternatives like libbitcoin. She sees the Core vs. Knots drama as manipulative warfare eroding consensus, pushing for unity between miners and merchants while warning against filters that \"don't work\" and could fragment the network.

5. **PoW supremacy and game theory geek**: She's big on Proof of Work over Proof of Stake (calls PoS sad-face emoji), highlighting hardware constraints, ASICs vs. CPUs, and how it beats Web of Trust or other models in simulations. Mining is about long-term economic viability, not quick thrills, and she's compared Bitcoin mining to Monero's RandomX for adversarial resilience.

6. **Self-custody and real-world use over HODL-only**: She's anti-paper Bitcoin (\"lame as fuck\"), pro self-custody, and critiques the \"pet rock\" narrative that stalls upgrades. Bitcoin's for spending and building parallel economies, not just number go up—though she gets the hedge against society angle. She's even nostalgic for early days when it was mined on hacker rigs.

7. **Philosophical and karmic take**: Bitcoin's a lesson in rage quitting bad systems, karmic retribution for harm, and building worlds with satire. She's tied it to Taoism, gnosis, and cyber warrior vibes, warning against ego and social engineering. It's bigger than any one person or fork—unity over division

Overall, her stance is Bitcoin as the uncompromised revolution: privacy-first, PoW-driven, scam-resistant, and freedom-enabling. She's not afraid to roast the community or suits hijacking it, but she's optimistic about its monk-like future ruling the world. Went back far enough to see her evolution from early HODLer to privacy crusader. What's one thing from this that surprises you, or got a follow-up on her views? 🚀